Agent

Software access & licence desk

Software requests arrive without the context that decides them: whether the tool is approved, whether a seat already exists, who owns the licence. This agent gathers that from your own records, tells the requester where things stand, and assembles the request for the licence owner. The owner approves, and the agent assigns nothing.

How it runs

Step by step

01

Take the tool request

Someone asks for access to a tool, in the channel or through the service desk.

02

Check the approved tool list

The agent checks whether the tool is on your approved list, links the entry, or says plainly that it is not there.

03

Find the licence position

It retrieves what your records say about seats, the renewal date and the owner, citing where each came from.

04

Show what already covers it

Where an approved tool already covers the need, that is shown, so the organisation does not buy the same capability twice.

05

Assemble the request record

A complete request is prepared with the requester, the justification, the licence position and the security review status.

06

The licence owner approves

The named owner approves or declines. The agent does not assign a seat or start a trial.

The harness

Exactly what this agent can see, touch and change

The same five controls sit behind every ollo agent. These are this one's settings — visible before you build it, not buried in an admin screen afterwards.

Context

What reaches the model

IT and asset managers fielding tool requests from across the business, especially where unapproved purchases and unused seats both go unnoticed.

Escalation

When it asks a person

The licence owner approves the request before any seat is assigned

Applications & Rights

Which tools it uses, and what it may do in each
ConfluenceRead only
SharePointRead only
JiraRead only
SlackReadWrites newCreates new records or documents. Never edits, moves or deletes anything that was already there.

Verification

How you know it’s right

Every claim links to the document it came from. A statement the agent cannot cite does not make it into the output — which is what makes the result reviewable in minutes rather than re-read end to end.

Who it’s for

IT and asset managers fielding tool requests from across the business, especially where unapproved purchases and unused seats both go unnoticed.

What you’ll need

  • An approved tool list connected
  • Licence and ownership records
  • An agreed request format
  • A named licence owner per tool

What you get

  • A cited answer on the tool's status
  • A complete request for the owner
  • A list of approved tools that overlap

What it doesn’t do

It retrieves and assembles. It does not buy software, assign or reclaim seats, approve a new vendor, or complete a security review.

How you get it

We build the first one with you

Not a template you configure alone. We sit with your team, build it on real data, and hand over the controls.

01

Scope

One session with the people who actually do the work. We agree what the agent reads, what it may write, and who approves.

02

Co-build

Built on your own data, not a sandbox. You watch it being made, so you know why it behaves the way it does.

03

Handover

You own the controls. Change the context, tighten the rights, move the approval gate — without coming back to us.

What it replaces

Parts of the work currently spread across the categories below. It does not replace any of those products outright.

Tool requests arriving with no contextLicence questions in the IT channelDuplicate tools bought by different teams
Estimated savingNot setNo figure ships until someone at ollo owns it and the method behind it.

Frequently asked

Can it reclaim unused seats?

It can show what your records say about assignment and last use, where those records are connected. Reclaiming a seat is an action in the vendor's admin console, done by the owner, and the agent has no rights there.

What about a tool that is not on the approved list?

It says so plainly and routes the request into your review process with the requester's justification attached. It does not guess whether an unapproved tool would pass review.

Does this replace our asset management tool?

No. It reads the records you already keep and answers questions about them in the channel where people ask. If your records are poor, the agent will show that quickly, which is useful but not the same as fixing it.

How does it know two tools overlap?

From the descriptions and categories in your own approved list. It shows the overlap and lets the owner judge, because tools in the same category are often bought for genuinely different reasons.

Let's Build

AI is a capability you build. Let's build it together.

30 minutes with our team and you'll leave with a real plan — not a sales pitch.