AI usage oversight pack
Once agents are running across several teams, the question IT gets asked is simple and hard: what have they been doing. This agent compiles the picture, covering which agents ran, which sources they read, where a person approved and where something was escalated. IT approves the pack before it is circulated.
Step by step
Gather the period's activity
Agent runs are collected for the review period, with the team, the agent and the sources involved.
Show the rights in force
For each agent, what it may read and what it may change is set out as configured, so drift from the approved record is visible.
Record where gates fired
Where an approval was required, the pack shows whether it happened and who gave it.
Flag escalations and refusals
Questions the agents escalated or declined are listed, which usually says more about your documentation than about the agents.
Draft the review pack
The pack is drafted in the format your security review expects, with the register of approved use cases set against actual use.
IT approves before circulation
IT reviews the pack and decides who sees it. Nothing is circulated automatically.
Exactly what this agent can see, touch and change
The same five controls sit behind every ollo agent. These are this one's settings — visible before you build it, not buried in an admin screen afterwards.
Context
What reaches the modelIT, platform and security leads who have to answer for AI use at a governance forum, and teams preparing for an internal or customer security review.
Escalation
When it asks a personIT approves the pack before it is circulated to security and the business
Applications & Rights
Which tools it uses, and what it may do in each
AWSRead only
Google CloudRead only
JiraRead only
SlackRead only
Google DriveWrites newCreates new records or documents. Never edits, moves or deletes anything that was already there.Verification
How you know it’s rightEvery claim links to the document it came from. A statement the agent cannot cite does not make it into the output — which is what makes the result reviewable in minutes rather than re-read end to end.
Who it’s for
IT, platform and security leads who have to answer for AI use at a governance forum, and teams preparing for an internal or customer security review.
What you’ll need
- A register of approved agents
- Connected activity and ticket sources
- An agreed review period and format
- An IT owner to approve the pack
What you get
- An activity summary per agent and team
- A rights and gates record
- A list of escalations and refusals
What it doesn’t do
It reports on the agents and sources you have connected. It is not a security monitoring tool, it does not watch your network or your endpoints, and it cannot tell you about AI use outside the platform.
We build the first one with you
Not a template you configure alone. We sit with your team, build it on real data, and hand over the controls.
Scope
One session with the people who actually do the work. We agree what the agent reads, what it may write, and who approves.
Co-build
Built on your own data, not a sandbox. You watch it being made, so you know why it behaves the way it does.
Handover
You own the controls. Change the context, tighten the rights, move the approval gate — without coming back to us.
Parts of the work currently spread across the categories below. It does not replace any of those products outright.
Frequently asked
Does this replace our security monitoring?
No, and it should not be presented as one. It covers agent activity and configuration within the platform. Network, endpoint and identity monitoring stay with the tools your security team already runs.
Can it show AI usage outside the platform?
Only where you connect a source that records it. Staff using a consumer chatbot in a browser is not something this pack can see, and we would rather say that than let a governance forum assume otherwise.
What is actually in the pack?
Which agents ran and for which teams, the sources each one read, the rights it holds, whether required approvals happened, and what it escalated or refused. The format is set during the co-build to match the review your forum runs.
Who is allowed to see it?
Whoever IT decides. The pack is produced for an owner and circulated only after they approve, because activity data across teams is sensitive in its own right.