Agent

Meetings into content

The best material your organisation produces is spoken on calls and never written down. This agent reads the notes and transcripts you point it at, finds the explanations and stories worth publishing, and drafts them in your formats. Anything traceable to a customer is held back until permission is confirmed.

How it runs

Step by step

01

Choose the meetings in scope

We agree what is included: internal sessions, webinars, and customer calls where consent covers reuse.

02

Read for reusable material

The agent extracts explanations, objections answered well and stories, each with its origin recorded.

03

Match to your formats

Material is mapped to formats you already publish rather than to a generic content plan.

04

Draft in the house voice

Drafts follow the same brand rules the brief agent applies, with sources attached to each claim.

05

Mark the permission status

Anything traceable to a customer is flagged as needing consent before use, whether they are named or not.

06

Marketing approves before publishing

Nothing is published by the agent. A person edits, clears permissions and publishes.

The harness

Exactly what this agent can see, touch and change

The same five controls sit behind every ollo agent. These are this one's settings — visible before you build it, not buried in an admin screen afterwards.

Context

What reaches the model

Marketing teams sitting on a library of recorded calls and internal sessions, and small teams where the expertise is in people's heads rather than in a content plan.

Escalation

When it asks a person

Marketing approves and publishes; customer material needs confirmed consent first

Applications & Rights

Which tools it uses, and what it may do in each
NotionRead only
SlackRead only
ConfluenceRead only
Google DriveReadWrites newCreates new records or documents. Never edits, moves or deletes anything that was already there.

Verification

How you know it’s right

Every claim links to the document it came from. A statement the agent cannot cite does not make it into the output — which is what makes the result reviewable in minutes rather than re-read end to end.

Who it’s for

Marketing teams sitting on a library of recorded calls and internal sessions, and small teams where the expertise is in people's heads rather than in a content plan.

What you’ll need

  • Recordings or notes stored where the agent can read them
  • Consent status recorded per meeting
  • House formats and voice rules connected
  • A publisher who approves

What you get

  • Drafted pieces in your formats
  • A source note per draft
  • A permission checklist for customer material

What it doesn’t do

It reads what was captured; it does not record or transcribe calls itself. Where consent for reuse is unclear, it drafts with the customer detail removed and tells you what would need clearing.

How you get it

We build the first one with you

Not a template you configure alone. We sit with your team, build it on real data, and hand over the controls.

01

Scope

One session with the people who actually do the work. We agree what the agent reads, what it may write, and who approves.

02

Co-build

Built on your own data, not a sandbox. You watch it being made, so you know why it behaves the way it does.

03

Handover

You own the controls. Change the context, tighten the rights, move the approval gate — without coming back to us.

What it replaces

Parts of the work currently spread across the categories below. It does not replace any of those products outright.

Content ideas lost in call recordingsGhostwriting from scratchManual transcript trawling
Estimated savingNot setNo figure ships until someone at ollo owns it and the method behind it.

Frequently asked

Is it safe to use customer calls this way?

Only where your consent covers it, which is a question for your team rather than the agent. It tracks permission status per source and will not produce a publishable draft from material marked restricted.

Will everything sound the same?

It follows your voice rules, which is the point, but drafts still need an editor. Teams that publish the output untouched end up with a recognisable sameness, and we say so during the co-build session.

Which meetings are worth including?

Usually internal teach-ins, webinars and sales calls where an objection was answered well. Start narrow: a small, well-chosen set of sources produces better drafts than everything you have ever recorded.

Does it handle video?

It works from the text your recording tool produces. If that tool writes transcripts to a location we can read, the agent reads them. It does not process video or audio itself.

Let's Build

AI is a capability you build. Let's build it together.

30 minutes with our team and you'll leave with a real plan — not a sales pitch.